The editorial board practices double-blind peer review. This process involves the following:

• First, the editors consider all manuscripts to assess their compliance with the journal subject matter and requirements.
• After the decision of the editors, submitted manuscripts are sent to at least two external experts working in the relevant field. Both external experts and specialists from among the members of the editorial board of the journal may be involved in the review. The manuscript undergoes a double-blind review: neither the authors nor the reviewers know each other.
• Reviewers' comments are transmitted to the authors, together with possible recommendations for the manuscript revision. The editor informs the authors, whether the manuscript is adopted without revision or authors are given the opportunity to review the manuscript and submit it again, or the manuscript is rejected.

In case of disagreement with the conclusions of the reviewers, the authors may provide the editorial office with a scientifically substantiated response to the comments provided, which will be considered by the reviewer.

Deadline 1-6 months

Reviewers should refrain from uploading manuscripts to the LLM software or using other LLM technologies that could lead to a breach of confidentiality.